Your input and give it serious consideration.Ĭurrently accepting ideas and suggestions for ways we can improve WebXPRT 4. Whether it’s positiveįeedback about our benchmarks, constructive criticism, ideas for completely newīenchmarks, or proposed workload scenarios for existing benchmarks, we appreciate If you have any thoughts about potential browser performance workloads, or any specific web technologies that you’d like to test, please let us know.ĭevelopment Community is our openness to user feedback. While making the benchmark even more valuable to users overall. Growing body of published WebXPRT 4 test results Any new tests will be add-ons that allow us to continue expanding the rapidly CurrentĪnd future WebXPRT 4 results will be comparable to one another, so users who’veĪlready built a database of WebXPRT 4 scores will not have to retest theirĭevices. Workloads that run separately from the main test and produce their own scores. Auxiliary tests would be experimental or targeted Prevent any confusion among WebXPRT 4 testers, we want to reiterate that anyĪuxiliary workloads we might add will not affect existing WebXPRT 4 subtest We’re open to the prospect of adding both non-workload features and new auxiliary tests, e.g., a battery life or WebGPU-based graphics test scenario. Are there features you’d really like to see, or ways we can improve the viewer? Please let us know, and send us your latest test results!Īs we mentioned in our most recent blog post, we’re seeking suggestions for ways to improve WebXPRT 4. We’re excited about the WebXPRT 4 results viewer, and we want to hear your feedback. The overall and individual workload scores of the pinned runs appear in a table. The screenshot below shows the viewer after I clicked the Compare runs button. The screenshot below shows the viewer after I pinned four runs and viewed them on the Pinned runs screen. The viewer also lets users pin multiple specific runs, which is helpful for making side-by-side comparisons. The screenshot below shows the viewer as I use the filter tab to explore additional filter options, such processor vendor. The screenshot below shows the viewer after I used the device type drop-down filter to select only desktops. The viewer includes a drop-down menu that lets users quickly filter results by major device type categories, and a tab that with additional filtering options, such as browser type, processor vendor, and result source. If the source is an external publisher, usersĬan click the Source link to navigate to the original site. Source of the result is PT, users can click the Run info button to see the Name of the test device, and basic hardware disclosure information. Percentile rank (66 th) among the scores in the current display, the The example above, the banner shows the overall score (227), the score’s If the user clicks to select the highlighted bar, the bar turns dark blue, and the dark blue banner at the bottom of the viewer displays additional details about that result. To view a single result in detail, the user hovers over a bar until it turns white and a small popup window displays the basic details of the result. Each vertical bar in the graph represents the overall score of a single test result, with bars arranged from lowest to highest. The screenshot below shows the tool’s default display. The viewer currently displays over 460 results, and we add new entries each week. With the viewer, users can explore all of the PT-curated results that we’ve published on, find more detailed information about those results, and compare results from different devices. The viewer provides WebXPRT 4 users with an interactive, information-packed way to browse test results that is not available for earlier versions of the benchmark. Make sure all tabs in your browser are closed and that no other browser is running.New visitors to our site may not be aware of the WebXPRT 4 results viewer and how to use it. The iPad Pro Generation 3 is from 23% to 66% faster running browser functions compared to the iPad Pro Generation 2.Ĭlick on the links above to run the tests on your iOS or macOS device. Part of the BrowserBench suite, it is a JavaScript benchmark suite focused on the most advanced web applications. Part of the BrowserBench suite, it is designed to put browser graphics systems to the test. To get the best rating, close all tabs and quit all other browsers. ( HIGHEST score = FASTEST )Ī browser benchmark from the same group that produced Basemark ES 3.1/Metal which we used in a previous test page. Runs six workloads (Photo Enhancement, Organize Album, Stock Option Pricing, Encrypt Notes/OCR Scan, Sales Graphs, and Online Homework). It is a performance test suite focused on JavaScript related workloads found in common web developer tools. Part of the BrowserBench suite, it measures the responsiveness of web applications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |